I got together with my writing group tonight. The topic for tonight’s discussion was a provocative one. It had in fact sparked a weird conversation on the Meet-up site. I had found the conversation rather amusing in that obscure and animated manner that we at times come across.
The topic for tonight’s discussion was the role of the ‘responsible’ writer.
An interesting notion regarding the ethics of what we write and how they impact the reading public.
Certain things were declared to keep us in the realm of respectability regarding our writing.
One was to not take a real person and fictionalize their life in a derogatory manner.
The second was not to be deceitful. Michael Moore’s ‘Bowling for Columbine’ was used as an excuse as apparently not all the things in that movie / documentary? were factual.
Still, sometimes you have to stand back and look at the message….yes?
Drive the point home by whatever means but some felt he’d been rather deceitful in the execution of telling the tale.
A lot of questions sprang to mind as I listened to the views expressed. We all agreed that journalism is held to a very different standard than your run of mill book.
And it should be.
The term ‘literal truth’ was a raised a few times and I sat considering what meaning this held.
It is a factual term that cannot be disputed. For example the Moon circles the Earth every twenty-eight days. It is a literal truth that is a proven fact and cannot be altered. Now that I had reconciled it’s meaning in my head then came the ’50 Shades of Truth.’
And I say this with tongue firmly planted in cheek. This particular book was mentioned a time or two as well tonight.
While almost everyone and their dog that I have spoken with will tell you how poorly written it is, I ask you this? What then was the appeal?
To say that a lot of bored housewives were out there smacks of a certain duplicity and insults women in general.
I read the first book. Didn’t like it. It was billed as erotica and in truth it was a poorly written romance. Nothing more.
But I will take my hat off (if I wore one) to E.L James. She sold this book through brilliant marketing. Sex and controversy! Hell, now that is combination that is irresistible. Get the public curious and they will take note. She also used social media much to her advantage as well.
I can recall when Michael Jackson wrote ‘Moonwalk’. The lead up to the release was hyped to the max and ‘promised’ to give us the skinny on the ‘gloved one’ in his own words.
Personally it was a disappointment for me.
Michael was trying to sell a story he’d been parroting for years and in many ways it read as though he was trying to convince himself as well. I didn’t buy it. And it made me sad.
The responsible writer…provocative.
What if a woman writes about her love and adoration for her husband who happens to be extremely abusive and controlling to the outside world? Does this set a poor example for our youth?
If a woman is raped in book and confesses to ‘liking it’ what message does this convey?
At the age of 12 or 13 I slipped beneath the covers with flashlight in hand and read my father’s copy of ‘The Happy Hooker” unbeknownst to him until I was caught. Back in 1970 I wasn’t too certain what much of what I was reading meant, but I can assure you I was not inspired to go out and fuck a German Shepard.
We need to respect that our children are not mindless sheep who will believe everything that they read. Also we must infuse a sense of kindness and love in them and teach them by example.
Mark Chapman read “Catcher in the Rye” It triggered something in him and he killed John Lennon.
Is the book at fault?
Mark Chapman was mentally ill and unfortunately the object he fixated upon was a brilliant musician. I love John Lennon’s music. His gift of song spoke to me on such a personal level.
There are many who condemn him for being and an abusive asshole.
I do not condone this type of behavior. What I saw was a man trying to change, wanting to be a different man, wanting to be better.
I have not always been the lovely woman I am today either.
John was not afforded certain opportunities as his life was cut short.
In high school we read two books back to back in social studies.
“Mein Kampf” and “The Diary of Ann Frank”
Quite simply the lesson was ’cause and effect’ intimately woven together and it was an incredibly powerful lesson.
One was the progression of an intelligent and extremely impotent and insecure man who was falling into the obscene and frightening belief of his own myth that he had created becoming the epitome of evil.
The other was the beautiful innocence of a girl hiding in an attic with her family experiencing the tender chutes and passions of youth only to be discovered and effectively killed.
I have always been fascinated by the human condition and what we choose to accept or reject. We can alter our memories particularly those that are extraordinarily painful. We can press them back and deny them simply because they are too raw and savage.
Human kind has a dark history in this regard. Through the ages the manner by which we’ve killed our own is truly disturbing.
And it continues. Atrocities still exist. I see the intolerance that hate has blossomed into and the false bravado these men try to wear. Very sad.
Young people are taken at such a young age and fed a litany of propaganda that they later act upon.
Think about this.
We tell our children there is a man named Santa that comes every year and flies about the world in a sleigh pulled by eight magical reindeer and delivers a gift to each and every child. Mall Santas’ sit listening to each child’s wish list and Canada Post will even send a child a letter back if they’ve written to the North Pole.
This is of course isn’t harmful to them, is it? There is a sweetness to it. Oh they will eventually grow up and know that it’s not true and when they have children of their own they too will carry on the myth of Santa.
I am simply using a very base example of how myth can affect the mind of a child as I can well recall laying in bed on Christmas Eve wondering if Santa would come. For a time I believed.
Now think of how they take young boys in the middle east and feed them fear, conditioning them to close their minds and only accept a ‘truth’ bound in darkness. Because to raise a child up believing that by forfeiting their life serves their ‘god’ and a higher purpose is truly tragic.
What I took from the meeting this night was more in keeping with free thought, free speech and the responsibility to ensure we always have it.